Writer.com has brand guidelines. ChatGPT has creativity. Neither has an audit log. Studio is the governance layer that sits between your LLM and "publish" — doctrine-enforced, drift-detected, fail-closed by default.
Every company is using LLMs to write. Almost none have an answer when the regulator or GC asks: "How did this claim get approved?"
Docs drafted in ChatGPT. Edited in Word. Approved in Slack. Published in Hubspot. When compliance asks "who approved this?", the answer is a 12-message thread.
The LLM writes "bank-grade security" on draft 47 even though your doctrine banned that claim on day one. Nobody catches it until legal does — after it ships.
Every writer on your team has a slightly different Claude. Six months in, your voice is a committee of model fine-tunes you never trained.
Executive drafts go through 5 stakeholders, 3 rewrites, and no one can tell which version got the CFO's actual sign-off.
Define your rules once. Every draft runs the gauntlet. Violations never reach a reviewer's inbox.
Your voice rules, policy rules, and prohibited claims — versioned, enforced, court-defensible.
Claude or GPT-4 writes against your doctrine and your source pack (Perplexity research, filings, interview notes).
Unverified numbers, banned claims, off-voice phrasing — flagged automatically before a human reads it.
State-machine approvals. Hash-signed publish receipts. Append-only audit log. Done.
"Every draft that goes to review is already doctrine-compliant. The reviewer's job is judgment, not policing commas."— What Studio looks like to your reviewer
Writer.com plus the audit trail your compliance officer actually needs.
| Capability | Studio | Writer.com | Jasper / Copy.ai | ChatGPT Team |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Versioned voice rules | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Enforced prohibited claims | ✓ | flagged | — | — |
| Drift detection | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Append-only audit log | ✓ hash-signed | — | — | — |
| Approval state machine | ✓ | comments | — | — |
| Break-glass override (logged + expiring) | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Fail-closed by default | ✓ | — | — | — |
Every client communication needs audit trail. Marketing rule enforcement is existential. Compliance officer reviews Word docs in Outlook today.
$200–500 per advisor / month
Every claim needs a source. MLR review is the bottleneck. Drift-free drafting + audit is the difference between six-week and same-day review cycles.
$2,000–5,000 per workspace / month
No "expert" claims. No confidentiality leaks. Partner hand-review on every marketing asset. Studio pre-filters violations before partner time is spent.
$300 per seat / month
Regulation FD. No forward-looking statements outside safe harbor. GC sign-off on every draft — now pre-cleared by Studio's doctrine engine.
$1,500 per company / month
Your security page says "bank-grade" and legal says no. Voice drifts across writers. You can't let the brand fragment. Studio enforces your line.
$99 per seat / month
Workspace per client. Doctrine per workspace. Draft handoffs with receipts. Compliance-ready deliverables without building the infra yourself.
$499 per agency / month + per seat
Volume pricing and compliance add-ons available. Annual contracts discounted 15%.
30-minute demo. See drift detection catch a bad claim in real time. Walk out with a doctrine template for your industry.
Or email studio@cichocki.com directly.
30-minute walkthrough. See drift detection catch a bad claim live. Walk out with a doctrine template for your industry.
Early access pricing, direct Slack line to the team, and you help shape the product.
Paste your brand or content guidelines. We run them through Studio's Doctrine Auditor and email you a compliance report — enforceability score, unenforceable rules rewritten, missing guardrails. No signup. No sales call unless you ask.